¶1Dissenting. — I cannot concur in the conclusion reached by the majority of the court. I think, under the showing made by plaintiff, she was entitled to have the questions of fact submitted to a jury. The right to trial by jury in eases of this character is guaranteed by the constitution of the United States as well as the constitution of this state, and should never be denied any citizen when such trial is demanded.
12 Idaho 762
Nelson v. Steele
Decided December 21, 1906
Idaho Supreme Court · decided 1906-12-21
This is an application in this court for a writ of mandate to compel the district judge to submit certain questions of fact arising on the return to an application for a writ of mandate to a jury.
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Writ is denied and the case dismissed · Decided 1906-12-21
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently February 1970
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →