Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 12 ILLAPP 463 - Ramsey v. Tully

Ramsey v. Tully’s Empirical Analysis

1883

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
6
states following
February 1921
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently February 1921

1 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

4018831890190019101920decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Illinois Central Railroad v. Cobb, Christy & Co. · Waterman v. Clark · Benton v. J. A. Fay & Co. · Priestly v. Northern Indiana & Chicago Railroad · Tobey v. Price

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is quite unnecessary to multiply the citation of cases. The principle which underlies them all is that where one of two' contracting parties, not being himself in default, suffers a lass by the wrongful default of the other, he ought to receive full and just compensation therefor. His recovery, however. is to ho limited to snch damages, in the language of Baron Alderson in Hadley v. Baxendale, ‘as may fairly and reasonably bo considered either «.rising naturally, i. e., according to the usual course of things, from the contract itself, or such as may reasonably be supposed to have been in the contemplation of both parties at the time they made the contract, as a probable result of the broach of it’ This definition excludes all such damages as are remote or merely speculative.’’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.