MANCHISI’s Empirical Analysis
1967
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1155 (§ 205 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1251 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Boesche v. Udall · Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Errico Scott · Hensley v. Wilson · 205 F. Supp. 612 - Todaro v. Pederson · Errico v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[n]o one here seeks to file a petition to obtain immediate family or preference quota status for the respondent, nor do we see that such a petition would be necessary.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“precluded [the alien] from the exemption of section 241(f) on the basis of his 2nd marriage to a lawful permanent resident ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.