Interim Decision #1864
MAI= OF WoL•
In Section 212(c) Proceedings
A-7242325
Decided by Board February 7, 1968
The discretionary power conferred upon the Attorney General under section
212(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Art does not encompass the authority to grant an unlimited and absolute waiver of excludability. However,
in view of applicant's necessity, as owner of a company, to make frequent
short business trips outside the United States, the discretionary authority
contained in section 212(c) is exorcised to authorize his readmission to the
United States from time to time after temporary visits abroad, over a period
of 3 years, notwithstanding his inadmissibility under section 212 (a) (22) of the
Act.
ON BEHALF or Seance: Irving A. Appleman
Appellate Trial Attorney
The case comes forward on appeal from the decision of the District
Director, Detroit District, rendered on September 26, 1967, wherein
he denied applicant's application for advance permission to return
to a lawful unrelinquished domicile under the provisions of section
212(e), Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1182(o)
Applicant is a 41-year-old married male alien, a native and citizen
of Germany who was admitted to the United States for permanent
residence on July 14, 1949. He has a United States citizen wife and
three United States citizen children.
On July 30, 1963 the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Michigan denied applicant's petition for naturalization on
the basis that he was barred from citizenship by section 315 (a), Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1426) 1 because he was an
alien who was relieved from training and service in the Armed Forces
of the United States because of alienage. Prior to this, in 1951 appli-
"Flee. 815. (a) Notwithstanding the provisions of section 405 ( b) any alien
who applies or has applied for exemption or discharge from training or *orrice
in the Armed Forces or in the National Security Training Corps of the United
States on the ground that he is an alien, and is or was relieved or discharged from
such training or service on such ground, shall be permanently ineligible to become
a citizen of the United States."
736
interim iiecision 71150,±
cant had executed at his local draft board Form SSS 130, Application
by Alien for Relief from Training and Service in the Armed Forces.
Applicant at the time he applied for citizenship contended that his
action in signing this form should not have barred him from citizenship because he did not realize the significance of his action. In this
appeal, he still makes this contention; however the whole question was
put to rest by the District Court decision on July 30,1963. •
Applicant being barred from citizenship by section 315 (a) , is thus
excludable from the United States by section 212(a) (22) Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1182(a) (22).) 2 However, section 212(c), Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1182(c) ) s
gives the Attorney General discretion to allow a permanent resident
alien to voluntarily depart and come back to an unrelinquished domicile of seven years. Prior to the present application for advance permission applicant had been granted such permission on three occasions.
However, his current application requests that he be granted blanket
permission to depart and return to the United States on an unlimited
basis, without having to specify dates of departure and return. The
District Director denied. such request. We deem that the denial was
proper.
If blanket permission was given for unlimited reentries this" would.
in effect be granting an unlimited and absolute waiver of applicant's
excludability under section 212(a) (22). We do not believe that section 212(o) confers upon the Attorney General any such broad authority. His discretionary power under this section to grant relief
does not encompass the authority to grant an unlimited waiver of
excludability.
The record shows applicant's business interests are such that they
require him to make rather frequent short trips outside the United
States, principally to Canada. He is the owner of a company employing a number of persons and it appears quite clear that the future•
expansion and prosperity of the company will depend a great deal
upon applicant's ability to make trips to other countries. It appears
that a large percentage of his business involves foreign trade and
commerce.
2 "Sec. 212(a) Except as otherwise provided in this Act the following classes
of aliens shall be ineligible to receive visas and shall be excluded from admission•
into the United States . . . (22) Aliens who are ineligible to citizenship, except
aliens seeking to enter as nonimmigrants . . ."
'Sec. 212(c) Aliens lawfully admitted for permanent residence who temporarily proceed abroad voluntarily and not under an order of deportation, and
who are returning to a lawful, unrelinquished domicile of seven consecutiveyears, may be admitted in the discretion of the Attorney General without regard:
to the provisions of paragraph (1) through (25) .. ."
737
Interim Decision #1864
This being the case we will direct the District Director, over the
period of the next three years, to authorize applicant to enter the
-United States from time to time after temporary visits abroad, despite
his inadmissibility under the provisions of section 212(a) (22). At
the end of the three year period applicant could then further petition
for an extension of similar discretionary relief.
ORDER; It is ordered that for a period of three years applicant be
authorized under section 212(c) Immigration and Nationality Act
(8 U.S.C. 1182 (c) ) to enter the United States from time to time after
temporary visits abroad, despite his inadmissibility under section
212(a) (22) Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1182(a)
(22) .)
738
12 I. & N. Dec. 736
WOLF
Decided July 1, 1968
Board of Immigration Appeals · decided 1968-07-01
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1426 (§ 315 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Decided 1968-07-01