Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

12 Johns. 151

Oothout v. Rooth

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1815

New York Supreme Court · decided 1815-01-15

<p>a notice oí ex ecuting a writ of inquiry at a certain day, “ provided an jüdgSshaii have then been obtained in the good6’” Th@ prov<¡!o°fmay be «sleeted as surplusage, If no interlocutory judgment should, in fact, and° tiúTn’o. roantermand-* l^such no-¡he’cos™1 pa7</p>

Decided 1815-01-15

Per Curiam.

¶1, Lhe proviso is unusual m notices, but is implied in every notice of this kind. If it should happen that no interlocutory judgment should be obtained, and no notice of the fact should be given, the party who gave such notice, would be liable to costs. The words in the notice might be rejected as surplusage. We do not think it a sufficient ground for setting aside the proceedings.

¶2Motion denied.

/12/johns/151 · .json · Public domain