Anonymous

Decided August 15, 1815

New York Supreme Court · decided 1815-08-15

IN this case, on á writ of error; the judgment of the court below had been.reversed in part, and affirmed in part, and the only question was as to the costs.

Decided 1815-08-15

Per Curiam.

¶1There is no doubt that a judgment may be reversed in part, and affirmed in part, (b)But the statute speaks only of the entire affirmance or reversal of a judgment. (1 N. R. L. 346. sess. 36. c. 96. sec. 13.) We think that Ho costs, in this case, are to be allowed on either side.

¶2 Smith v. Jansen, 8 Johns. Rep. 111. S. P. 558.