Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

12 Johns. 431

Jackson v. Case

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1815

New York Supreme Court · decided 1815-10-15

A VERDICT was taken for the plaintiff in this cause, at the _ ... i. i . . r , Orange circuit, in 1814, subject to the opinion or the court on a case to be made. No case having been made by the plaintiff, ■ . ‘ , according to the rules and practice of the court, on an affidavit of the above facts, and of a. service of a notice on the plaintiff’s attorney, that the defendant would move for judgment at this term; - Fisk now moved that judgment be entered for the defendant.

Decided 1815-10-15

Per Curiam.

¶1The course pursued by the defendant’s attorney was correct. The rule permitting either party to give notice of the argument of a case, presupposes that the case is settled; so that there can be no controversy on that point, when a motion is made to bring on the' argument. Where a verdict is taken subject to the opinion of the, court, no order for a stay of proceedings is necessary; and the defendant must have leave from the court to proceed. To allow the defendant to notice the case for argument would be a very inconvenient practice. The court would, then, be obliged to hear the plaintiff’s excuse for not having made up bis case in due season; and if there were any disagreement between the parties, as to facts, affidavits wo.uld be necessary : Thus would be' drawn before the court, on days assigned to hear enumerated motions, matters intended to be confined to the days fixed for the hearing of nonenumefated motions. No sufficient excuse having been shown, on the part of the plaintiff, for not having made the case, the motion must be granted.

¶2Motion granted.(a)

¶3Vide Beardsley's executors v. Root, 11 Johns. Rep. 406.

/12/johns/431 · .json · Public domain