State v. Cassady’s Empirical Analysis
1874
Citation profile
38 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently July 2013 · most notably State v. Hill (1962), State of Kansas v. Roberts (1915)
38 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The verdict might properly have been simply guilty of larceny. Yet •specifying the particular connection of defendant with the crime did not vitiate the verdict. It wrought no prejudice to his rights.” (p.557.)”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““That the rule that possession of property recently stolen makes out a prima facie case of guilt, and throws upon the defendant the burden of explaining that possession, is one of long standing and abundantly fortified by authorities, no one can question.” (p. 559.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Schaefer““Such possession is said to raise a presumption of guilt, and, if unexplained, is sufficient to warrant a conviction.” (The State v. Cassady, 12 Kan. 550, 559 .)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Schaefer
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.