Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 12 Kan. App. 2d 284 - State v. Waldschmidt

12 Kan. App. 2d 284 - State v. Waldschmidt’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
4
states following
March 2015
most recently cited

4 district · 18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently March 2015

4 district · 18 state decisions

1301987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wong Sun v. United States · Katz v. United States · Payton v. New York · Coolidge v. New Hampshire · Boyd v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Since [the officer] could not see into this private family area from the street, the Court certainly would agree that he would have conducted an unreasonable search had he climbed over the fence, or used a ladder to peer into the yard without first securing a warrant. [Emphasis added]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.