Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

12 L. Ed. 2d 1039

Smith v. Crouse

Decided June 22, 1964

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is reversed. Douglas v. People of State of California, 372 U.S. 353 , 83 S.Ct. 814 , 9 L.Ed.2d 811 .”

quoted by 1 later decision, including Donnell v. Swenson

Relies on Douglas v. People of State of California · Hill v. New York

Cited together with Fisher v. United States · Etchieson v. Texas · Santana v. United States

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1964-06-22

How this case has been cited

Cited by 1,249 later decisions (20 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2023 · most notably Griffin v. California (1965), United States v. Ventresca (1965)

766 federal appellate · 55 district · 195 state decisions — followed in 33 states

48801964197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is reversed. Douglas v. California, 372 U. S. 353.

Mr. Justice Harlan,

¶2dissenting.

¶3In my opinion the question whether Douglas v. California, 372 U. S. 353, should be given retroactive application is deserving of plenary consideration. Cf. my dissenting opinion in LaVallee v. Durocher, 377 U. S. 998.

/12/led2d/1039 · .json · Public domain