Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 12 Mass. App. Ct. 260 - Commonwealth v. Averill

12 Mass. App. Ct. 260 - Commonwealth v. Averill’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
3
states following
November 2006
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently November 2006

9 state decisions

60198119902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Lewis v. Martin · United States v. Moylan · Commonwealth v. Robinson · United States v. Simpson · United States v. May

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The common law defense of necessity deals with obvious and generally recognized harms, not with those which are debatable and, indeed, the subject of legislation and government regulation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.