Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 12 McCanless 170 - Kyle v. State

Kyle v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1961

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
3
states following
March 2014
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently March 2014

18 state decisions

60196119701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wooten v. State · Ashby v. State · Hopson v. State · Bishop v. State · Bradam v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he proof of the [defendant’s] agency as the doer of the crime, while an essential requisite in order to convict, does not form a part of the corpus delicti.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.