12 Md. App. 251 - Kelley v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

8 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““the jury could have found from credible evidence before it that appellant at his own suggestion called Yeager and arranged for the sale of marijuana to Morton. This agreement between appellant and Yeager that the drug be sold to Morton resulted in the unlawful combination, as charged, to commit the crime proscribed by Code, Art. 27, § 277,' then in effect, and the conspiracy was complete. Compare Randolph v. State, 10 Md. App. 89 . Whether or not appellant thereafter shared in the profits or received some other consideration is not material.” Id. at 258.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 42 Md. App. 365 - Amos v. State

2. ““ T said, ‘Do you have any grass that you would like to sell?’ He said, ‘My brother has some, but he’s not home right now.’ Then on top of that he said, ‘But I know a guy that might have some. If you want to come in, I’ll call him.’ ” Kelley v. State, 12 Md. App. at 253, n. 2 .”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 42 Md. App. 365 - Amos v. State

3. ““A peremptory challenge may be exercised as a matter of right until the time that the jury is sworn.””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Brice v. State