Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

12 Misc. 549

Boyden v. Baldwin

City of New York Municipal Court · decided 1895-05-15

<p>An employment of a sales agent by a servant of the employer is fully ratified by the subsequent conduct of the employer in filling orders obtained by such agent and paying him commissions.</p> <p>Open oral agreements to pay commissions on future sales of merchandise are legal and valid obligations, and are enforcible until terminated by some act of the parties.</p> <p>A sales agent is entitled to his" commissions, notwithstanding the participation of friends in the procurement of the orders.</p>

Decided 1895-05-15

Comlan, J.

¶1This is an appeal from a judgment entered by direction of the court, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial.

¶2This action was brought to recover commissions on sales of merchandise belonging to defendants by plaintiff to third parties, under an agreement that he was to receive ten per centum on all immediate or direct orders as well as on all subsequent orders from such new customers so long as they continue to trade with defendants.

¶3The evidence of Boulger and of the plaintiff clearly shows the employment of the plaintiff by Boulger, who was then in the employ of the defendants, about December, 1891.

¶4The subsequent conduct of the defendants in filling orders and paying commissions constituted a full and complete ratification of that employment.

¶5Open oral agreements to pay commissions on future sales of merchandise have always been a fruitful source of dissatisfaction and litigation.

¶6Such contracts are, however, legal and valid obligations and enforcible in our courts until terminated by some act of the parties.

¶7The contract sued on does not seem to have been terminated down to the time plaintiff asked for an accounting in October, 1892.

¶8The amount of goods sold is not seriously disputed by defendants, but it is claimed that plaintiff is not entitled,to *551commissions on a great portion of the orders because they were initiated by others, and that the influence of the plaintiff did not contribute directly to the sale. This contention cannot be sustained.

¶9The plaintiff was entitled to his commissions notwithstanding the participation of friends.

¶10It is not contended that the friendly assistance plaintiff received in any way increased defendants’ liability to pay commissions to others, nor can it be denied that they got the benefit of the orders so obtained.

¶11The appellants do not urge any of the rulings of the trial judge as error, and on all the facts we are of the opinion that the direction made by the trial judge was warranted.

¶12The judgment is, therefore, affirmed, with costs.

¶13Fitzsimons, J., concurs.

¶14Judgment affirmed, with costs.

/12/misc/549 · .json · Public domain