Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

12 Misc. 653

Dunn v. Wehle

City of New York Municipal Court · decided 1895-07-01

<p>Appeal from an order of discontinuance.</p>

Decided 1895-07-01

McCabthy, J.

¶1It seems to me clear that the want of jurisdiction in this case appears on the face of the complaint.

¶2Before the plaintiff can claim any money judgment he must apply to a court of equity, as appears by the demand of the complaint for judgment, to wit: “ First, that the alleged assignment aforesaid be declared fraudulent and void and of no effect, and that the same be set aside.”

¶3The court has no power to grant such relief, and the order to discontinue without costs was properly allowed.

¶4Order is, therefore, affirmed, with costs.

¶5Van Wyck, J., concurs.

¶6Order affirmed, with costs.

/12/misc/653 · .json · Public domain