Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 12 NM 192 - Grunsfeld Bros. v. Brownell

Grunsfeld Bros. v. Brownell’s Empirical Analysis

1904

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
3
states following
April 1953
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently April 1953

2 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

40190419101920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Boese v. King · Auffm'ordt v. Rasin · Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Sittig · Martin v. Berry · Day v. Bardwell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The other objections that the plaintiffs are not judgment creditors of the defendant D. R. Brownell has been passed upon by this court in an able and exhaustive opinion written by the late Judge Hamilton in the year 1897. In that case the ground of attack made upon the bill of complaint, which sought to set aside a conveyance of property, was that the complainants were simply general, and not judgment creditors, and that a general creditor will not be heard in a court of equity to attack and set aside a fraudulent conveyance made by his debtor until he has first obtained a judgment. But our Supreme Court held otherwise, and although the demurrer interposed in the lower court which raised this question had been sustained, this court reversed that judgment, and remanded the case, with directions to the court below to overrule the demurrer. * ^ ‡»”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.