Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 12 NY 170 - Snedeker v. . Warring

Snedeker v. . Warring’s Empirical Analysis

1854

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
13
states following
September 2009
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently September 2009 · most notably Blake-McFall Co. v. Wilson (1920), Historic District Commission v. Hall (2007)

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 26 state decisions — followed in 13 states

901854186018701880189019001910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““I apprehend the question, whether the pyramids of Egypt or Cleopatra’s Needle are real or personal property, does not depend on the result of an inquiry by the antiquarian whether they were originally made to adhere to their foundations with wafers, or sealing wax or a handful of cement. It seems to me puerile to make the title to depend upon the use of such or of any other adhesive substances, when the great weight of the erection is a much stronger guaranty of permanence.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““A thing may be as firmly affixed to the land by gravitation as by clamps or cement. Its character may depend much upon the object of its erection. Its destination, the intention of the person making the erection often exercises a controlling influence.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.