Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

12 N.Y.2d 1013

Ungar v. Sarafite

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 28, 1963

New York Court of Appeals · decided 1963-02-28

Cited by 1 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 1964

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1963-02-28

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1In the first above-entitled proceeding: Order affirmed, without costs. (See Matter of Ungar, decided herewith.) No opinion.

¶2In the second above-entitled proceeding: Order affirmed, without costs. However, we point out that where the alleged contempt consists of the making of charges of wrongdoing by the Trial Judge himself he should, where disposition of the contempt charge can be withheld until after the trial and where it is otherwise practicable, order the contempt proceeding to be tried before a different Judge. No opinion.

¶3Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Burke, Foster and Scileppi. Judge Van Voorhis concurs in result only.

/12/ny2d/1013 · .json · Public domain