People v. Howard’s Empirical Analysis
1962
Citation profile
44 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 71 later decisions — most recently January 2008 · most notably United States v. Sobell (1963), Clark v. Perez (2008)
44 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Canizio v. People of State of New York · Matter of Bojinoff v. People · People v. Sadness · People v. McCullough · Matter of Hogan v. Court of General Sessions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 71 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It would introduce confusion in the administration of justice if defenses or objections which might have been made and reviewed on appeal could be reserved as grounds for collateral attack upon the judgment of conviction years after it was rendered.” 12 N.Y.2d at 68 , 236 N.Y.S.2d at 43 , 187 N.E.2d at 116 .”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.