State v. Chapple’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

3 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “`There is no . . . constitutional requirement that a court try its luck with other sanctions before excluding a disruptive defendant. . . .' United States v. Beasley, 72 F.3d 1518, 1530 (11th Cir. 1996). `[N]o formalistic sequence of warnings is required. Nor is it necessary for more than one warning to be given. . . .' Scurr v. Moore, 647 F.2d 854, 858 (8th Cir.1981)(quotation and citation omitted).”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 982 So. 2d 565 - Brown v. State

2. “was the only real option that would maintain order in the courtroom.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 982 So. 2d 565 - Brown v. State

3. “if you make statements in front of the jury like that,”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Chapple