Chappell v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 22 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · United States v. Agurs · Matter of Chad S. · 34 Wash. App. 179 - Department of Social & Health Services v. Moseley · Michael F. v. State ex rel. Department of Human Services
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“lin reviewing a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, we look at the proceedings as a whole.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“[JJludicial scrutiny of counsel's performance must be highly deferential.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“The rule is that when an attorney takes no action on behalf of his client, there is a legal presumption of prejudice,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.