Sanabria v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

9 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““Neither the record nor appellant’s brief indicates that appellant requested the Board to hold a hearing to permit appellant to produce evidence that the appeal was timely filed. “On July 2, 1973, the Board entered the only Order the law would permit on the facts of this case. The appeal was dismissed as being filed beyond the statutory ten-day period for filing. The requirements of Section 502 . . . are mandatory in the absence of fraud or manifestly wrongful or negligent conduct by the administrative agency. . . . No such evidence was offered and, in fact, no hearing was requested to offer such evidence.” (Citations omitted.) (Emphasis add ed.) Sanabria, supra, 12 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. at 44 , 317 A.2d at 57 .”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. Dunofsky