Arnold v. House’s Empirical Analysis
1880
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
December 1908
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Bailey · State v. Cardoza · Adger v. Pringle · Massey v. Adams · Lucken v. Wichman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It does not follow that an improper use of a valid security destroys the proper right under the security itself. The defect must exist in the security, which is impaired by the fraudulent purpose or intent entering into the elements of the contract.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Miller v. Wroton
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.