¶1I dissent. I agree that notice was-íiécessaiy, but with regard to the time at which it must be given," it may be done at any time before action was *203brought, and I think the acceptance of the service of the process authorized the presumption of notice.
12 S.C.L. 199
Poole v. Tolleson
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided May 15, 1821
Supreme Court of South Carolina · decided 1821-05-15
ThE plaintiff was the en.. dorsed by the defendant, at The plaintiff demanded pa] but without giving notice oi this action against the endo (Huger,) holding that the ;ee of a promissory note, en-the note had become due. it of the maker of the note ; refusal to pay, commenced . : And the presiding Judge ■ice of a refusal to pay was unessential, in such a case, gavina decree for the plaintiff ; Whereupon the defendant moved this court to reverse the decree, and for anon-suit…
Decided 1821-05-15