Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

12 S.C.L. 407

Rodericks v. Payne

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 15, 1821

Supreme Court of South Carolina · decided 1821-05-15

In this case, a writ of Replevin was issued on the 14tfe April, 1819 ; and on the 13th May following, the declaration was filed. No further proceedings were had until the 25th July, 1820, when a rule to plead was posted. The defendant did not plead, and on the 2d of September following, the plaintiff obtained an order for judgment.

Decided 1821-05-15

Mr. Justice Huger

¶1delivered the opinion of the court.

¶2It is not pretended that the plaintiff is not bound to post his rule to plead within the day and year from the filing of his declaration; but it is contended that a plaintiff in re-plevin so called, is in fact defendant, and therefore not bound by those rules which apply to plaintiffs generally. However different in some respects the plaintiff in re-plevin may be from plaintiffs generally, he must be governed by the same rules, when similarly situated. In filing his declaration and posting his rule to plead, there is no difference between them, and the same rules which govern in one case, extend to all. If the plaintiff in replevin were not bound to post his rule, neither would he be bound to declare, and if not bound to declare within a- fixed period; it is difficult to imagine how and when the suit would terminate.

¶3The motion is refused.

/12/scl/407 · .json · Public domain