12 So. 3d 1085 - State v. Pugh’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
May 2016
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · 661 So. 2d 442 - State v. Smith · Pacheco-Medina v. Oregon · Suwannee Swifty Stores, Inc. v. Georgia Lottery Corp. · 922 So. 2d 517 - State v. Pigford
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Interstate territorial jurisdiction is arguably a more difficult issue than intrastate venue.... A judge alone must decide the issue of territorial jurisdiction, but only if that issue is brought before the court before trial, as mandated by the Code. A defendant who did not file a motion to quash raising venue as an issue could not successfully assert on appeal that the trial court lacked jurisdiction due to failure to prove venue. State v. Matthews, 93-0275 (La.App. 1st Cir.1993), 632 So.2d 294 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.