12 So. 3d 496 - State v. Harvey’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
November 2018
most recently cited
15 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 839 So. 2d 1 - State v. Smith · State v. Williams · 441 So. 2d 719 - State v. Soco · State v. Egana · 969 So. 2d 1233 - State v. Shaw
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Considering the totality of the facts and circumstances in the instant case, and according credit to the good sense and fairmindedness of the jury, it cannot be said that one would be thoroughly convinced that the rebuttal argument complained of improperly influenced the jury and contributed to the verdict. Thus, it cannot be said that the trial court abused its discretion in denying defendant’s motion for mistrial, implicitly determining that the comments by the prosecutor were not so prejudicial as to deprive defendant of his right to a fair trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.