Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

12 So. 3d 917

Luciano v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2009-07-10

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 2010

1 federal appellate ·

Relies on 3 So. 3d 1067 - Valdes v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2009-07-10

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1*918 ON REMAND

PER CURIAM.

¶2 In accordance with the mandate from the Florida Supreme Court, we vacate our prior opinion and substitute this opinion in its stead.

¶3 Appellant’s convictions for shooting from a vehicle and shooting into an occupied vehicle are affirmed. 1 Valdes v. State, 3 So.3d 1067 (Fla.2009). Based on the concession by the State of the lack of eviden-tiary support for the award of investigative costs, we remand this cause with instructions that the trial court strike the award. The trial court may re-impose such costs upon appropriate motion and proof.

¶4 CONVICTIONS AFFIRMED; AWARD OF COSTS REMANDED.

TORPY, LAWSON and COHEN, JJ., concur.
1

¶5 . § 790.15(2), Fla. Stat. (2006); § 790.19, Fla. Stat. (2006).

/12/so3d/917 · .json · Public domain