Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

12 So. 3d 921

Alcon Construction Co. v. Williams

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2009-07-16

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently December 2014

3 state decisions

Relies on Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. Carter · Vazquez v. Wendy's

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2009-07-16

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1DENIED. See, e.g., Vazquez v. Wendy’s, 931 So.2d 152, 152 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006) (“Prior to considering whether the order departs from the essential requirements of law, ... the petitioner must establish that the order results in irreparable harm.”); Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. Carter, 680 So.2d 546, 547 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996) (holding “the time, trouble, and expense of an unnecessary trial is not ‘irreparable harm’ when determining whether the threshold elements of certiorari jurisdiction have been met”).

KAHN, PADOVANO, and LEWIS, JJ., concur.
/12/so3d/921 · .json · Public domain