Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 12 SW3D 258 - Johnson v. Commonwealth

Johnson v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
8
states following
November 2020
most recently cited

27 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently November 2020 · most notably State v. Reid (2000), State v. Chasity West (2005)

27 state decisions

1401999200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Kumho Tire Company, Ltd., et al. v. Patrick Carmichael, Etc., et al. · Frye v. United States · Crane v. Kentucky · Yagow v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In such circumstances, ... the expert opinion would be admissible without a Daubert hearing but ... an opposing party would be entitled to be heard with evidence to the contrary. In this respect ... judicial notice relieves the proponent of the evidence from the obligation to prove in court that which has been previously accepted as fact by the appropriate appellate court.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “cannot adopt by judicial notice the evidence introduced in [one] case for the purpose of proving a similar proposition in another case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Sr v. Jn
  3. “Whether to grant a continuance is generally within the sound discretion of the trial court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.