Gragg v. Gragg’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently April 2020
18 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 21 Cal. 3d 779 - In Re Marriage of Stenquist · Owens v. State · Cronin v. Howe · Carson Creek Vacation Resorts, Inc. v. State, Department of Revenue · 40 Cal. 3d 848 - In Re Marriage of Saslow
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“courts utilizing the analytical approach will separate the benefits into a retirement component and a true disability component, with the retirement component being classified as marital property and the disability component being classified as separate property”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[D]isability payments do not constitute marital property, because they are intended as replacement for income the disabled spouse would be earning currently and would be able to earn in the future had the spouse not become disabled.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Marital Property Treatment of Pensions, Disability Pay, Workers' Compensation, and Other Wage Substitutes: An Insurance, or Replacement,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Holman v. Holman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.