Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 12 U.S. 431 - Prince v. Bartlett

Prince v. Bartlett’s Empirical Analysis

12 U.S. 431 · 1814

Citation profile

42
cited by 42 later decisions
4
cited 4 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
March 1981
most recently cited

14 federal appellate · 10 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 42 later decisions (4 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 1981 · most notably Sturges v. Crowninshield (1819), United States v. State of Oklahoma (1923)

14 federal appellate · 10 district · 5 state decisions

120181418201830184018501860187018801890190019101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bartlet v. Prince

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “‘•In case oí insolvency, the United States are not entitled to priority of payment, unless the insolvency be a legal and known insolvency, manifested by some notorious act of the debtor, pursuant to law.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““The words of the act extend the meaning of the word ‘insolvency’ to cases where ‘a debtor, not' having sufficient property to pay all his debts, shall have made a voluntary assignment thereof, for the benefit of his or her creditors.’ The word ‘property’ is unquestionably all the property which the debtor possesses; and the word ‘thereof’ refers to the word ‘property’ as used, and can only be satisfied by an assignment of all the property of the debtor. Had the Legislature contemplated a partial assignment, the words ‘or part thereof,’ or others of similar import, would have been added.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““In all cases of insolvency, or where any estate in the hands of the executors, administrators or assigns shall be insufficient to pay all the debts due from the deceased, the debt or debts due to the United States * * * shall be first satisfied.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.