Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 12 UTAH2D 348 - Benson v. Probst

Benson v. Probst’s Empirical Analysis

1961

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
March 1989
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Gochenour v. Cleveland Terminals Bldg. Co. · Tamm v. Ford Motor Co. · 35 Ohio App. 76 - Connolly v. National Surety Co. · Henderson v. Binkley Coal Co. · Herb Ford, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It appears unimportant whether the claim was scheduled or not, since the authorities uniformly determine that a claim like the one here becomes an asset in the hands of the trustee in bankruptcy, under the Bankruptcy Act simultaneously with the claimants’ adjudication in bankruptcy, with plenary power to deal with it as an asset and as the trustee and the federal courts deem proper and which it is their duty to perform.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.