Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 12 Va. App. 691 - Alexander v. Alexander

12 Va. App. 691 - Alexander v. Alexander’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
1
states following
October 2015
most recently cited

29 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently October 2015 · most notably 13 Va. App. 151 - Watkinson v. Henley (1991), 12 Va. App. 1245 - Scott v. Scott (1991)

29 state decisions

150199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 4 Va. App. 326 - Graves v. Graves · Featherstone v. Brooks · 12 Va. App. 18 - Richardson v. Richardson · Carswell v. Masterson · 4 Va. App. 365 - Mayhood v. Mayhood

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]f the amount of child support is in dispute, in spite of a prior agreement, the trial court must address "the issue of determining child support." Code § 20-108.1. Consequently, it must do so in accord with Code §§ 20-108.1 and 20-108.2 and must, therefore, first determine the presumptive amount of child support in accordance with Code § 20-108.2. Once the presumptive amount is determined, the trial court may deviate from the presumptive amount if such deviation is justified by factors recognized in Code §§ 20-108.1 and 20-107.2. These factors may be reflected in provisions in the separation agreement which may, therefore, be the basis for deviating from the guidelines.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.