12 Va. App. 899 - Weizenbaum v. Weizenbaum’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
33
cited by 33 later decisions
1
states following
September 2009
most recently cited
33 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Carson v. American Brands, Inc. · 10 Va. App. 1 - Blank v. Blank · Thomasson v. Thomasson · Allen v. Parkey · Lawrence v. Lawrence
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In suits for divorce, annulment and separate maintenance, and in proceedings arising under subdivision A 3 or L of § 16.1-241, the court having jurisdiction of the matter may, at any time pending a suit pursuant to this chapter, in the discretion of such court, make any order that may be proper (i) to compel a spouse to pay any sums necessary for the maintenance and support of the petitioning spouse____”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the decree must determine that “the rules or methods by which the rights of the parties are to be finally worked out have been so far determined that it is only necessary to apply those rules or methods to the facts of the case in order to ascertain the relative rights of the parties, with regard to the subject matter of the suit.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage“subject to alteration and amendment” by the judge before entering an appealable order.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.