Rogers v. Larsen’s Empirical Analysis
1976
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 48 U.S.C. § 1561 · 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1251 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Graham v. Richardson · William Truax v. Mike Raich · Torao Takahashi v. Fish and Game Commission · Sugarman v. Dougall · Williams v. Williams
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the United States Attorney and officials of the Immigration and Naturalization Service have stated to this Court that the local statute does not conflict with federal law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Rogers v. Larson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.