Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 12 WASH 310 - Buddress v. Schafer

Buddress v. Schafer’s Empirical Analysis

1895

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
5
states following
November 2013
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently November 2013

4 federal appellate · 16 state decisions

601895190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kirkpatrick v. McElroy · Littlefield v. Nichols · Van Dyke v. . Maguire

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““To determine whether a former judgment is a bar to a subsequent action, it is necessary to inquire whether the same evidence would have maintained both of such actions.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.