Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 12 Wash. 2d 408 - Bartow v. Bartow

12 Wash. 2d 408 - Bartow v. Bartow’s Empirical Analysis

1942

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
April 1987
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently April 1987

6 state decisions

2019421950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ruge v. Ruge · Beers v. Beers · Lockhart v. Lockhart · Harris v. Harris · Holcomb v. Holcomb

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A decree for alimony is permanent in that it continues in force until a change in circumstances occurs.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.