Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 12 Wash. App. 103 - Allen v. Abrahamson

12 Wash. App. 103 - Allen v. Abrahamson’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
4
states following
March 2016
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently March 2016

3 federal appellate · 11 state decisions

9019741980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Collins v. United States · Pimentel v. Conselho Supremo de Uniao Portugueza do Estado da California · Schoenholz v. . New York Life Ins. Co. · 1 Wash. 2d 285 - Sun Life Assurance Co. v. Sutter · Newman v. Commissioner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The general rule [in Washington] and elsewhere as to attempted changes of beneficiaries on an insurance policy is that courts of equity will give effect to the intention of the insured when the insured has substantially complied with the provisions of the policy regarding that change.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The rule requiring substantial compliance with the policy terms in effectuating a change of beneficiary becomes necessary for the purpose of demonstrating with a high degree of certainty that the deceased insured unequivocally desired to make that change, and that he did not some time thereafter abandon his purpose by failing to take affirmative steps to carry out his intent.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Substantial compliance with the terms of the policy means that the insured has not only manifested an intent to change beneficiaries, but has done everything which was reasonably possible to make that change.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.