12 Wash. App. 142 - Kaas v. Privette’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
24 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently October 2005
24 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 67 Ill. App. 2d 315 - Citizens Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Fischer · 56 Wash. 2d 449 - Obde v. Schlemeyer · 83 Wash. 2d 70 - Clausing v. DeHart · 2 Wash. App. 845 - Shermer v. Baker · 79 Wash. 2d 745 - Johnson v. Harrigan-Peach Land Development Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is now recognized generally that those facts must be disclosed which are so vital and material to a transaction that if known by one party and not the other, the agreement would be voidable. In such circumstances the failure to disclose the vital facts is fraudulent. 529 P.2d at 28 .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“"Unlawful offers, sales, purchases. It is unlawful for any person, in connection with the offer, sale or purchase of any security, directly or indirectly: "(1) To employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud; "(2) To make any untrue statement of a material fact or to omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they are made, not misleading; or "(3) To engage in any act, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon any person."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“(1) Any person, who offers or sells a security in violation of any provisions of RCW 21.20.010 or 21.20.140 through 21.20-.230, is liable to the person buying the security from him or her, who may sue either at law or in equity to recover the consideration paid for the security, together with interest at eight percent per annum from the date of payment, costs, and reasonable attorneys' fees, less the amount of any income received on the security, upon the tender of the security, . . ..”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.