Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 12 Wash. App. 15 - Hendricks v. Lake

12 Wash. App. 15 - Hendricks v. Lake’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
3
states following
September 2009
most recently cited

25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently September 2009 · most notably 96 Wash. 2d 785 - Tyler Pipe Industries, Inc. v. Department of Revenue (1982), 65 Wash. App. 285 - Peck v. Siau (1992)

25 state decisions

1001974198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 52 Wash. 2d 317 - Port of Seattle v. International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's Union · 56 Wash. 2d 204 - Glaser v. Holdorf · 50 Wash. 2d 304 - Paganelli v. Swendsen · Lewis v. Kujawa · 10 Wash. App. 969 - Bersos v. Cape George Colony Club

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is a well settled rule that one who seeks relief of either a temporary or permanent injunction must establish (1) that he has a clear legal or equitable right, (2) that he has a well grounded fear of immediate invasion of that right by the one against whom the injunction is sought, and (3) that the acts complained of are either resulting in or will result in actual and substantial injury to him. Port of Seattle v. International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's Union, 52 Wn.2d 317 , 324 P.2d 1099 (1958); . . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “It is a well established principle that a subsequent taker from a good faith purchaser without notice takes all the rights of his grantor.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.