12 Wash. App. 267 - State v. Hinton’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2115 · 18 U.S.C. § 371
Relies on Emich Motors Corporation v. General Motors Corporation · 80 Wash. 2d 293 - Friedlander v. Friedlander · 73 Wash. 2d 533 - State v. Dana · 83 Wash. 2d 797 - State v. O'CONNELL · United States v. Bazinet
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Prior to the statement being admitted, the court on defendant’s request held a CrR 101.20W [now CrR 3.5] hearing and found defendant signed the statement voluntarily. The statement was then admitted into evidence. In view of the finding of voluntariness, we find no prejudicial error. The court having first found that the statement was voluntarily given, all protection intended by the CrR 101.20W hearing was achieved.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.