12 Wash. App. 296 - State v. Wilder’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently June 2021
16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Schneble v. Florida · 60 Wash. 2d 214 - State v. Sullivan · 81 Wash. 2d 618 - State v. Walls · 11 Wash. App. 216 - State v. Smith · State v. Bradley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) Any person who shall with intent to defraud, make, or draw, or utter, or deliver to another person any check, or draft, on a bank or other depository for the payment of money, knowing at the time of such drawing, or delivery, that he has not sufficient funds in, or credit with said bank or other depository, to meet said check or draft, in full upon its presentation, shall be guilty of unlawful issuance of bank check. . . . (4) Unlawful issuance of a bank check in an amount greater than two hundred fifty dollars is a class C felony. (5) Unlawful issuance of a bank check in an amount of two hundred fifty dollars or less is a gross misdemeanor”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“• (2) Shall obtain from the owner or another the possession of or title to any property, real or personal, by color or aid of any order for the payment or delivery of property or money or any check or draft, knowing that the maker or drawer of such order, check or draft was not authorized or entitled to make or draw the same, or by color or aid of any fraudulent or false representation, personation or pretense or by any false token or writing or by any trick, device, bunco game or fortune-telling; or •-• Steals such property and shall be guilty of larceny. (Emphatie added_) Effective July 1, 1976, that section has been replaced by Revised Code of Washington 9A.56.100. 51 Interim Decision #2721 RCW 9.54.090 provides in part: Every person who steals or unlawfully obtains, appropriates, brings in to this state, buys, sells, receives, conceals, or withholds in any manner specified in RCW 9.54.010.— (5) Property of the value of more than twenty-five dollars if obtained by color or aid of any order for the payment or delivery of property or money or any check or draft, knowing that the maker or drawer of such order, check, or draft was not authorized or entitled to make or draw the same;... . . . shall be guilty of grand larceny. . . . After reviewing the language of the Washington statute, we conclude that the words "intent to deprive or defraud”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. WESTMAN
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.