12 Wash. App. 355 - State v. Broussard’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
December 1984
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 60 Wash. 2d 214 - State v. Sullivan · 71 Wash. 2d 621 - State v. Boehme · 81 Wash. 2d 95 - State v. Carroll · Green v. State · Biggs v. Donovan-Corkery Logging Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A regular physician or surgeon shall not, without the consent of his patient, be examined in a civil action as to any information acquired in attending such patient, which was necessary to enable him to prescribe or act for the patient. . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“construed to permit recognition of the physician-patient privilege in criminal cases.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.