Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 12 Wash. App. 40 - State v. Johnson

12 Wash. App. 40 - State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
2
states following
January 2013
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently January 2013

16 state decisions

8019741980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Telfaire · United States v. Barber · 62 Wash. 2d 561 - Ferree v. Doric Co. · 79 Wash. 2d 512 - State v. Randecker · 4 Wash. App. 588 - State v. Newman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “by examination and cross-examination in the forum of the trial court.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “If the identification by the witness may have been influenced by the circumstances under which the defendant was presented to him for identification, you should scrutinize the identification with great care. You may also consider the length of time that lapsed between the occurrence of the crime and the next opportunity of the witness to see the defendant, as a factor bearing on the reliability of the identification.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Whether the witness had an adequate opportunity to observe the offender at the time of the offense will be affected by such matters as how long or short a time was available, how far or close the witness was, how good were lighting conditions, whether the witness had occasion to see or know the person in the past.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.