Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

12 Wend. 199

Sickles v. Fort

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 7, 1834

New York Supreme Court · decided 1834-08-07

The question here was, whether referees may impose the payment of costs as a condition to granting the postponement of a hearing.

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 1843

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1834-08-07

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1By the Court,

Nelson, J.

¶2For good cause shown, the referees have power to postpone a hearing. 2 R. S. 384, § 43. The postponement being submitted to their discretion, they may impose such, terms as are usually imposed by courts upon putting off trials.

/12/wend/199 · .json · Public domain