¶1*228In this case it was objected that but seven days notice of the motion had been given, as was shown by affidavit; in answer to which the defendant’s counsel read the admission of service of notice, in which the plaintiff’s attorney admitted due service of notice. The Chief Justice held the admission to be sufficient, and overruled the objection.
12 Wend. 227
Talman v. Barnes
Decided October 9, 1834
New York Supreme Court · decided 1834-10-09
This was an action of ejectment, against John Barnes and Hiram Barnes, for the recovery of 175 acres of land.
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1834-10-09
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently May 1910
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →