Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

120 A.3d 87

In re Seguin

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · decided 2015-07-23

Relies on In Re Fuller · In Re Sibley

Decided 2015-07-23

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM

¶2On consideration of the certified order disbarring respondent from the practice of law in the state of New Jersey by consent, this court’s May 27, 2015, order directing respondent to show cause he should not be disbarred as reciprocal discipline, and the statement of Bar Counsel, and it appearing that respondent has failed to file either a response to this court’s order to show cause or the affidavit required by D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g), it is

¶3ORDERED that Robert Seguin is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in the District of Columbia. See In re Sibley, 990 A.2d 483 (D.C.2010); In re Fuller, 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C.2007) (rebuttable presumption of identical reciprocal discipline applies to all cases in which the respondent does not participate). It is

¶4FURTHER ORDERED that for purposes of reinstatement the period of respondent’s disbarment will not begin to run until such time as he files a D.C.Bar. R. XI, § 14(g) affidavit.

/120/a3d/87 · .json · Public domain