¶1This action was tried before the same refere'e and at the same time as actions Nos. 2 and 3
¶2In this case the referee excluded all the documentary evidence and made similar findings to those considered in the two prior cases, including the finding as to the appointment and qualification of ■ Preston as receiver, the evidence to establish which he had excluded.
¶3This judgment must also be reversed and a new trial ordered before another referee, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.
¶4Ingba-ham, Lahghlin, Scott and Lambert, JJ., concurred.
¶5Judgment reversed, new trial ordered before another referee, costs to appellant to abide event. Settle order on notice.
¶6Preston v. Albee, No. 2 (120 App. Div. 89); Preston v. Arthur, No. 3 (Id. 93)—[Rep.