State v. Morgan’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State Ex Rel. Flournoy v. Wren · 26 Ill. 2d 203 - The PEOPLE v. Watson · 19 Ariz. App. 257 - State v. Jung · 50 Ala. App. 636 - Hutto v. State · 26 Ariz. App. 118 - State v. Boniface
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[n]otwithstanding the error in the address ..., the warrant described [the defendant]'s apartment with reasonable certainty and particularity.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Lohse · State v. Madsen““Constitutional requirements relating to searches are satisfied in these cases if the warrant describes the premises to be searched with reasonable certainty, and a technical description is unnecessary. * * *” People v. Watson, 26 Ill.2d 203 , 186 N.E.2d 326, 327 (1962), cited in State v. Morgan, 120 Ariz. 2, 3 , 583 P.2d 889, 890 (1978).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Madsen“if the property is sufficiently recognizable from the description to enable the officer [executing the warrant] to locate the premises with definiteness and certainty”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Lohse
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.